I have 24-plus years of experience dealing with internal
politics, and I can say that internal politics play a role in every project,
and is a key factor to project success or failure. The dynamics of the internal politics can
very, and sometimes you do not need the majority for a project to succeed, if
the minorities are in the right positions within the organizational
structure. Having the right key players
onboard can make a project, but if one link of the chain is faulty, the entire
project is at risk.
A perfect
example of how internal politics factors into a project was a project I was
involved with in 2003 on the island of Guam.
Poaching was a big problem on Federal property, but due to safety
concerns patrol officers were not allowed to pursue poachers into the
jungle. To overcome this problem, I was
allowed to put together a team and give them specialized training for dealing
with extraordinary situations. After an
eight-week academy, Guam Naval Security had a Special Response Team (SRT),
trained in close quarter combat, special weapons and tactics, combat tracking,
and land navigation. When patrol officers
called in poachers running into the jungle, SRT responded, went in after them,
and apprehended them. Within six months,
word got around the island about not poaching on Federal property due to the
team. SRT became the core group of
another project a few months later known as COBRATAC (Chemical, Ordnance,
Biological and Radiological Tactical team).
COBRATAC was designed to respond to incidents involving hazardous
materials, weapons of mass destruction, explosive devices and other criminal or
terrorist acts. In less than two years
from its inception, COBRATAC was the only HAZMAT response team in the Marianas
Islands region because the local agencies didn’t have that capability.
As you can
imagine, to accomplish two major team projects within just two years was an
enormous undertaking, and required tremendous coordination. Team members received extensive training to
become experts in many specialty fields, and specialized gear was required to
fulfill missions effectively. But all
was not rainbows and butterflies where internal politics was concerned. The key players in their success were myself,
the Regional Security Officer, The Federal Fire Chief, and a civilian
contractor. Four people made this all
happen. I can honestly say that if any
one of them were not onboard, the projects would have failed.
I was the
only Chief in a group of seven CPOs that supported the project and many “closed
door” discussions were held about SRT. I
was pretty much ostracized from the CPO community during my time on Guam,
because I put the team before the politics of the CPO community. To put everything in perspective, I left in
the summer of 2005, and before the end of the year SRT had been disbanded as a
team, and team members were split between patrol sections. COBRATAC fell soon after, when the Regional
Security Officer transferred, and the Fire Chief retired.
Not only
does internal politics play a part during the project, but continues after
completion. If the champions of a
project do not have replacements with similar interest and passion in the
project, it will fail.
I dont really know what to say man you dont let anything for us. Anyhow im just going to write my opinion about it.
ReplyDeleteI think that it is important for defining the roles and organizing the team, but i dont think it's one main thing that can cause a failure or success of a project. There are many other more important factors to a project to succeed like defining the plan, meet the requirements of your client, deliverables and outcomes, and many other things.
It sounds like you have had some extensive experience with internal politics. However, it sounds like your accomplishments were erased through external politics. This can be somewhat disconcerting when you have a tight knit group that is dismantled due to external factors.
ReplyDelete